In shallow drilling — holes up to 2–3× diameter — chip evacuation is straightforward. The chip forms, breaks, and falls back up the flute by gravity and the helical geometry of the flute channel. The drill never really packs, and the main failure mode is cutting edge wear.
In deep drilling — holes deeper than 3–4× diameter — the chip evacuation path lengthens. Chips formed at the bottom of the hole must travel up a longer path to clear the top. In a standard helix drill, the flute geometry is optimized for cutting efficiency, not chip transport. As the hole gets deeper, chips begin to pack in the flutes, which increases thrust force, generates heat, and eventually causes drill breakage — not from dull edges but from torque loading on a packed flute.
This is the specific problem parabolic flute drills were designed to solve.
A parabolic flute drill has a curved flute profile — specifically a parabolic cross-section — that creates a wider, more open flute channel compared to a standard helix drill. The geometry increases the chip space (the void volume inside the flute) and changes how chips curl and move up the flute channel.
The practical effect: chips move up the flute more efficiently, packing is reduced, and the drill can cut deeper without peck cycles. In the right application, a parabolic drill can drill 4–8× diameter in a single pass where a standard drill would need multiple pecks to clear chips.
The wider flute also reduces friction between the chip and the drill body as chips move upward — which reduces the torque component from chip transport and keeps more of the machine's power available for actual cutting.
L/D ratio — length to diameter ratio — is the standard way to think about when parabolic flutes become worth using. The general rule: standard helix drills to L/D of 3–4. Parabolic drills from L/D of 3–4 up to their rated depth, typically 5–8× diameter.
For example: a 1/2" drill in a 2" deep hole is 4× diameter (L/D = 4). At this depth, a standard drill starts to show packing behavior in many materials. A parabolic drill handles it cleanly. A 1/2" drill in a 3/8" deep hole is less than 1× diameter — there is no chip evacuation issue and a parabolic drill offers no advantage over standard.
Material matters too. Soft, long-chip materials (aluminum, some plastics) are worse for chip packing than short-chip materials (cast iron, hardened steel). In aluminum at 4× depth, chip packing is a real problem with standard drills. In cast iron at 4× depth, cast iron's graphite chips are short and pack less — a standard drill may work fine at that depth where it would fail in aluminum.
Parabolic drills have tradeoffs. The wider, more open flute means less drill body cross-section supporting the cutting edges — in some materials, particularly in interrupted cuts or when drilling hard materials where rigidity matters, a standard helix drill is stronger and more resistant to deflection.
Parabolic drills also tend to produce less aggressive cuts per revolution because the flute geometry changes the chip-forming mechanics slightly. In soft materials at shallow depths where the goal is fast cutting, a standard drill at high feed may outperform a parabolic drill optimized for chip transport.
For the typical job shop drilling 1/4" to 3/4" holes in mild steel to depths of 1–3× diameter, standard helix cobalt is the right tool and the parabolic geometry adds cost without benefit. The switch to parabolic is justified when L/D goes above 4, or when chip packing and pecking are already observed problems in a specific application.
Before investing in parabolic drills, many shops solve deep hole chip packing with peck drilling — programming the drill to retract periodically to clear chips during the hole cycle. Peck drilling works, and for occasional deep holes it's the correct approach: you already have the tool, the pecking cycle just adds time.
Parabolic drills become economically justified when deep holes are frequent and the peck cycles are adding measurable time to your cycle. If you're running a production cell with 100 deep holes per shift and each peck adds 2 seconds per hole, that's 200 seconds per shift — enough that the better tool pays back quickly in cycle time savings and reduced drill changes from breakage.
For job shop work where deep holes are occasional, peck and standard drills. For production work with consistent deep hole applications, parabolic drills.
Parabolic drills can be resharpened, but not on all grinders. The parabolic flute profile requires a grinder that can follow the full flute radius, not just regrind the cutting point. On a WinsloMatic or similar dedicated drill grinder, parabolic drills resharpen well — the grinder handles both the point geometry and the flute. On a basic drill grinder that only handles the point angle, resharpening a parabolic drill produces a geometrically correct point but may not restore the parabolic flute geometry near the tip. The result still works but may not evacuate chips as well as a new drill.
If you're running parabolic drills in production and chip evacuation performance is critical, verify that your resharpening service has the capability to handle parabolic flutes before sending them out. Ask specifically — many resharpening services work only with standard helix geometry.
Parabolic drills cost more new — but properly resharpened they run the same number of deep holes as new. If you're replacing parabolic bits after one use, that's a resharpening problem, not a tooling problem.
Send Your Drills →