On the surface, indexable insert drills seem like a clear upgrade. You swap the inserts when they wear out and you're cutting again in minutes — no regrinding, no waiting, no tracking a grinding program. Feed rates are aggressive, cycle times drop, and modern insert geometries handle a wide material range.
HSS twist drills, by contrast, seem old-school. But they've been the backbone of production drilling for over a century for a reason: low per-unit cost, wide size availability, repairability through resharpening, and forgiving behavior in setups that aren't perfectly rigid.
The economic comparison depends heavily on volume, setup quality, hole diameter, and what your shop actually does on a regular shift. Getting it wrong in either direction wastes money — either spending $80+ per insert body on a job that runs 20 holes per week, or running dull HSS at 200 SFM on a production cell that runs 2,000 holes per shift.
High-volume production in consistent materials. If you're running the same steel alloy, same diameter, same tolerance for hundreds or thousands of holes per shift, insert drills earn their keep. The aggressive feed rates compress cycle time significantly — a ½" insert drill at recommended feeds typically outpaces HSS by 2x to 4x in material removal rate. At high volumes, that's measurable revenue.
Large diameters. Above about ¾", and especially above 1", HSS twist drills get expensive. A 1" M42 cobalt drill costs real money and grinds down with each resharpening. A 1" insert drill body is a one-time capital purchase; insert costs are relatively low per hole. The crossover point varies, but for most job shops it lands somewhere between ⅝" and ¾" depending on material and volume.
High-strength materials where geometry matters precisely. In 304 stainless, titanium, Inconel, or hardened alloy steels, insert geometry is engineered and consistent lot to lot. You're not relying on a resharpened drill where the chisel edge may be slightly off and the web is thicker than spec. Every insert comes out of the package with the same cutting edge preparation, the same relief angle, the same coating thickness.
CNC with high spindle rigidity and reliable fixturing. Insert drills want consistent cutting conditions. They don't tolerate chatter the way HSS does. On a well-set-up CNC machining center with solid workholding, you'll get the performance the catalog promises. On a manual drill press with an old chuck and worn quill bearings, you'll break inserts.
Low to medium volumes, mixed materials. If a job runs 50 to 500 holes in one material this week and something different next week, HSS is almost always the better economic choice. You don't recoup the insert drill body cost on short runs, and you already have HSS in inventory from 1/16" up to whatever you need. HSS is ready — insert bodies in the right diameter may not be.
Small diameters under ½". Insert drill technology doesn't scale down well. Below about ½", you're back to solid carbide or HSS for economic and geometric reasons. The insert body needs physical space for the insert seats, coolant ports, and structural integrity — below ½" that starts getting complicated and expensive. HSS and solid carbide are the practical choices in small diameters.
Shops without rigid setups. Manual drill presses, radial arm drills, older Bridgeport-style mills, portable magnetic drills — these setups have compliance and vibration that HSS handles and insert drills don't. A dull HSS drill in a loose setup just cuts slowly. A worn insert or a chatter event in a loose setup can fracture an insert and damage the insert body, which is a $40–$80 loss.
Shops that resharpen. This is the part that rarely gets discussed in insert-vs-HSS comparisons. A resharpened HSS drill at $2–$4 per resharpening against a new drill cost of $8–$20 makes a compelling case at any volume. Insert costs per hole are low in high-volume production, but they're not zero. If your HSS program includes a resharpening relationship, your effective tooling cost per hole drops substantially below the sticker price comparison.
The simplest way to think about the decision:
Under ½" diameter, any volume: HSS or solid carbide. Insert drills aren't practical here.
½" to ¾" diameter, under 500 holes/week: HSS. The volume doesn't justify insert drill capital cost.
½" to ¾" diameter, over 500 holes/week in consistent material: Evaluate insert. Run the math on insert cost per hole vs. resharpened HSS cost per hole and cycle time differential.
Over ¾" diameter, any volume above ~100 holes/week: Insert drill territory. HSS drill costs at large diameters make the insert model increasingly attractive even at moderate volumes.
These thresholds shift based on material (harder materials favor insert drills sooner), machine rigidity (rigid machines unlock more insert drill value), and your actual resharpening cost (shops with in-house grinders or cheap external resharpening push the crossover toward higher volumes).
Insert drill salespeople rarely ask: "What are you paying to resharpen your current HSS?" Because the answer often kills the insert drill argument on medium-volume work.
If a ½" HSS drill costs $12 new, lasts 200 holes per edge, gets resharpened 6 times at $3 per resharpen, and produces 1,400 holes total — your tooling cost per hole is under a penny. A comparable insert drill at $0.04/hole in inserts beats nothing on that math unless you factor in cycle time. And cycle time only matters if the machine is your bottleneck, not the operator or the upstream process.
For shops with a resharpening program — whether in-house or mail-in — the break-even point for insert drills moves significantly toward the high end. The economic case for inserts isn't "HSS is expensive" — it's "machine time is expensive and I have the volume to justify it."
If you're not measuring resharpened HSS cost per hole, you're not making the comparison fairly. It's a number you can calculate in about five minutes with your current tooling invoices and hole count estimates.
Most job shops running general steel, mixed orders, and manual or light CNC equipment should be running HSS with a disciplined resharpening program. The capital cost of an adequate insert drill inventory adds up fast when you account for the range of diameters a job shop needs — and insert drill bodies aren't standardized across manufacturers.
Where insert drills make sense in the job shop context is typically in one or two specific diameters run at high volume on a dedicated CNC. Not across the whole shop — just at the production bottleneck where cycle time matters and the setup justifies the tool.
Production cells running dedicated operations — a part that runs all day, every day, in one material — are where insert drills earn unambiguous ROI. For everything else, a well-maintained, properly resharpened HSS program is usually the better answer than spending on insert bodies that don't get enough cycles to pay back.
Resharpened HSS at $2–$4 per drill beats buying new every time. Mail in your worn-out twist drills and we'll bring them back to spec.
Get a Quote →